Department of Defense – Stiletto High Tech Water Craft

By pcparts. Filed in Videos  |   
Tags: , , , , , ,
Home del.icio.us this! Digg this! RSS 2.0 


The “Stiletto,” a shallow-fill up craft made of a tough, frivolous carbon composite material, offers a safer, more comfortable ride and is easily reconfigured to accommodate technological advances and the military’s needs, said Navy Cmdr. Greg E. Glaros, a transformation strategist in the Office of Force Transformation. Stiletto was initiated in the DoD transformation office in association with US Special Operations Command, he said. When fielded, the boat will be available for use my all services. It’s meant to get special operations forces to their missions quickly with a top speed of more than 50 knots, Glaros said. Persons forces, a total of 15 per boat, also may maybe benefit from its unusual hull design. Described as an “M-hull” because of its resemblance to the letter “M,” the fill up Stiletto displaces is pulled owing to tunnels under the boat. The fill up mixes with incoming air from the forward movement of the craft and makes an air cushion with the intention of the boat rides on, he said. Glaros said this cushion may maybe be a back-saving benefit for persons using Stiletto for transport. The vertical impact to the neck and the vertebrae from riding on a traditional small transport craft have been likened to a “10-G shock,” or the body suddenly weighing 10 times its own consequence, at least twice an hour, he said. If a seat fails, with the intention of shock can spike to 20 Gs. Stiletto’s other purposes include what Glaros describes as “techno exploration.” Basically, he said, the boat is a floating conduct experiment. The

share save 171 16 Department of Defense   Stiletto High Tech Water Craft

25 Comments

  1. Comment by NamVetBuck:

    “The majority of the people of the armed forces ” have NOT select the path “to die”, they have chose with the intention of the enemies of America are too perilous to let live , therefore they terminate them in fantastic numbers, more than persons gallant warriors succumb themselves.

    For “respecting” the military, you guaranteed seem to forget who it is with the intention of protects your frankness to spout PETA crap here.

  2. Comment by NamVetBuck:

    I’ve disproved your statement with the intention of animals have no relation to humans , confirmed a small number of medical achievements animal investigate has benefitted humans , and yet you say animal testing “is immoral “:… with the intention of means you ignore facts and logic.

    Conclusion : you base your responses and positions on emotions , rather than factual grounding for them = liberal.

    Ya can’t talk sensibly with a liberal…in this vicinity ANYTHING !

  3. Comment by Gtrplyr1:

    yea but maintenance an animal alive in the heat of battle has no similarity to human survival, different animals are affected by trauma in different ways. Nothing said can make it proper or respectable. Why not test on actual humans, the scum of the earth in the middle east? Yes soldiers die in battle and it is sad the majority of the people in the armed forcces chose with the intention of path.

  4. Comment by NamVetBuck:

    Incorrect ! Pig aortic valves have been transplanted into humans {my dad got one in 1998} , primates be fond of monkeys and chimps are used in immune studies because they have 99 % of the same genes we do. Vaccines are developed using horse serum. Mice are used to host tumors to try out cancer vaccines.

    There have been studies done on animals to see what kind of armor vests work , gunfire wound treatment , and a host of other things with the intention of directly affect soldiers battlefield survival.

  5. Comment by Gtrplyr1:

    Water supply animal genetics and biological makeup have no relation at all to man. The bodies of both animal and man can not be compared. Different hormones, cells, brain makeup etc. So in actuality not only is it inhuman, but it is completely excessive.

  6. Comment by NamVetBuck:

    Not as sick as a mother , wife , or family member standing next to a grave of a KIA soldier with the intention of might have been saved if a lab animal had provided the answer to saving the soldiers life. Get genuine,,,,what’s more vital ? I’ll go with a human life every time.

  7. Comment by Gtrplyr1:

    water supply what does animal genetics, I respect the military, but with the intention of is kind of sick man…

  8. Comment by NamVetBuck:

    Better the animal dies so with the intention of a live American soldier comes back from the battlefield…the stupid animals are NOT gonna defend your frankness to be an idiot….you will be dead .

  9. Comment by Gtrplyr1:

    yeah i know but im not

  10. Comment by spartan1080:

    you sound be fond of a fuckin peta member.

  11. Comment by Gtrplyr1:

    Department of defense kills innocent animals.. They shoot, burn and poison animals to train soldiers on ways to prolong life in the battle field..

  12. Comment by wertziouk:

    and subs the germans have the preeminent ones, not guaranteed if thats a excellent business though

  13. Comment by Cta2006:

    Why buy the Swedish Visby class, when you can buy the ” Skjold Class ” of the Norwegian navy. Made and designed in Norway, it’s the fastest warship in the world, going in surplus of 60 knots. It’s stealth and larger than the Stiletto. Search for the ” Skjold class ” here on youtube.

  14. Comment by saawordup:

    pretty cool looking too…

  15. Comment by HazeGreyAndUnderway:

    thanks :)

  16. Comment by gizkoj:

    Hazegrey….. Hahahaha Excellent one!!

  17. Comment by 2HEXJUMPER:

    it’s a strategic stealth utensile for SPECIAL operations…whom preeminent are not detected by the enemy.
    catch my drift ? :) )

  18. Comment by HazeGreyAndUnderway:

    nope, too huge a risk of lead poisoning in the Chinese one.

  19. Comment by theunknownknows:

    For insertion/extraction of SpecOps or intelligence personnel etc? No need for 16 creep guns there.

  20. Comment by cy156326:

    oh, be fond of there isn’t a boat with the intention of can withstand torpedos and antiship missiles. seriously, whow, you’re talking out of your ass

  21. Comment by cy156326:

    i don’t reckon the chinese version is better. honestly speaking, the european and U.S. lead in stealth technology mainly in boats.

  22. Comment by asianwong:

    i reckon the chinese one is better

  23. Comment by SgtDrDeath:

    This craft is a copy of the Swedish “Smyge” craft.
    US must buy the Visby stelth corvett, it is operational an awesome!

  24. Comment by tomtos2000:

    only $90 of RPG may maybe able to sink it down… $300 of torpedos may maybe sink it quick… $400 of anti-ship missile may maybe able to sink with the intention of ship quick…

  25. Comment by zomgFletch:

    Carbon structure isn’t just so bullet proof, and I don’t see a lot of guns on with the intention of puppy. Hopefully it’s more of an experimental concept than a ship they plot on using regularly…

Comments are closed.